03-16-2021, 01:38 PM
(03-16-2021, 01:34 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: I saw almost IDENTICAL to what you saw, when I viewed it last night.
People who throw out, "10 of them were coverage or cleanup sacks," are just angry and bitter. **** 'em.
At the absolute worst, it is a lateral move, at best, we have a double-digit sack guy.
BuT hE hAd A bEtTeR lInE tHaN wE dO!!!
He also played double+ the amount of snaps he had in a previous year, so maybe that's the uptick in production? **** the analytics, he's on a different team and different scheme now. Even if our scheme is the worst on the planet, he may be perfect for it and go off for even more sacks this year.
Let things play out FFS. Toxicity is disgusting.
Yep, everything needs context. If these signings help us sign some more in other positions than WJIII and Lawson and those guys hold serve and the other pieces contribute, the. It ends up as a win. If we just sit on our hands and replace the ones we lost with these guys, then that’s just a failure on FO.
