03-23-2021, 12:03 PM
(03-23-2021, 11:47 AM)yang Wrote: Yes, I am absolutely 100% saying there is a factually a strong statistical correlation from success in college to pros. And I am sure you have seen further statistical breakdowns such as target share and breakout age. This doesn't mean there isn't a range of projections and outliers, but you can pick the non-successful college guys for your team if you like. I'll pass.
Again, if Pitts is such and fantastic freak and outlier why were Chase's stats immensely better? I mean, I can find lots of TE's that were worse than Pitts and draft them later and expect them to be all pro as well. You would think that's crazy though, right?
No, there really isn't. It's not about picking "non-successful" the point is simply the stats don't tell you who the player is and doing so is a fool's errand.
Because they played for different teams, with different schemes, alongside different personnel? Is that a serious question?
