Simple Question What's Your Answer and Reason

[*rfaulk34*]

(03-22-2021, 10:01 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Right, so don’t get locked onto either one. If Sewell is gone the BPA is going to be a pass catcher (Pitts, Chase, Smith, etc). There’s nothing wrong with going either way. It seems most of us that want a Pitts or a Chase are totally on board with taking Sewell if he’s there, but the other camp wants OL no matter what. Be it Slater, Darrisaw, trade back and take someone else, etc. I just don’t like that OL in the 1st or bust mentality. There’s lots of good options at offense at 5.

I keep bouncing around like i'm an superball, fired into a concrete box at high velocity. Everyone loves shiny new toys (including me) but when it comes down to it, in the middle of the season when Burrow doesn't have time to set, scan the field and throw...everyone rightly yells the old, true adage; build from the inside out. 

If Sewell is available, i just don't see how you pass on him. I still think they can get Sewell, a guy like Rashod Bateman in the 2nd and then a guy like Royce Newman in the 3rd. Now, with what they have from FA and the draft, your line should be stacked. RBs are already set. Getting Bateman or one of the other good, similar WRs will be a great compliment to Boyd and Higgins and now the WRs are set. 

Taking Sewell just seems like a more practical, need-centric way to do it, while getting one hell of an athletic Olineman and still get some really good players after round 1.