Chase versus Pitts

[*SHRacerX*]

(03-25-2021, 10:51 AM)Au165 Wrote: Why do you disagree? Can you point to something technically he is doing wrong? You told me earlier he couldn't run the full tree, but now you say there isn't a specific route he can't run. Funny enough, Chase runs a more limited route tree because where he aligned and he is not nearly as precise running things like a slant for instance as Pitts is. Pitts isolated in the red zone on a reduced split simply isn't fair. He can go fade then he comes back with the stutter slant and finally the whip route.

It's okay, you can simply say the "TE" next to Pitts name is what bothers you. You mention the other guys force teams to "drop safeties", which I am guessing you mean play a two high shell. The reality is a guy like chase forces teams to play a single high robber look which gives this Boyd and Higgins man to man looks all game, something I'm sure Burrow would really appreciate.

I simply believe Chase creates more mismatch issues than Pitts.  If you are going to line up Pitts outside, fine, but I don't think he is as strong as Chase. 

You completely disregarded my point about Kelce lining up outside less than 5% of the time.  So, tell me where you would line up Pitts and let me know if you believe he is as good in that role as Chase, Waddle, or Smith.