03-28-2021, 02:51 PM
(03-28-2021, 02:16 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: How many times do I have to explain this: if the 66% fo the first three "examples" that Fred posts are false, why would anyone waste the time to read the rest, especially when Fred has been known to post false links before? (I know he'll try to get me banned for that, so I apologize to the mods, but I'm not bashing or attacking him, I'm just stating facts.)
A good debater starts off their argument with strong facts and finishes strong, so why would I bother to think the rest of the links had anything worthwhile if 2 of the first 3 were wrong?
Lol. Brad. You’re arguing something that I’m not arguing. This isn’t hard. I’m not saying you are dumb for not reading the rest of his post. I understand why you didn’t, crystal clear.
I’m laughing at you because you said you look into what people post, and then you didn’t read his post. That’s it. I thought it was funny.
