11-05-2015, 01:58 PM
(11-05-2015, 01:52 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: I think the issue is that some of us see no reason for it to be inappropriate other than the sexual angle, and if we are looking at the sexual angle then the question of people attracted to the same sex as themselves is a legitimate one.
It's hard if the only reason we see for it being inappropriate is the sexual angle when the only explanation for any other angle is just that it is because anatomy. Without having something descriptive as to why it is inappropriate other than the sexual angle, how can we really discuss the issue other than that one angle?
You have already admitted that you do not see the issue because you do not have children. There is nothing for you to protect in these instances, you are looking at this like .... Who cares let them all live ..... This issue tears away at a lot of things in a school setting. It's not just about locker room usage. It basically blows up girls sports. Which ironically title 9 was supposed to protect.
This isn't just about letting a small handful of kids play dress up. This impacts several things in schools.
