04-03-2021, 05:40 PM
(04-03-2021, 02:10 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: The immunity for gun manufacturers was implemented in order to prevent the gun control groups from litigating manufacturers into oblivion. It does not indemnify them from damage cause by shoddy manufacturing or other such mistakes. It only prevents them from being sued directly when someone uses one of their products to kill someone. It's really no different than a car manufacturer being sued for someone speeding and then killing someone in an accident and them being sued because the same car had a faulty brake system. The far left really makes a stink about that immunity for firearms manufacturers, but it was implemented to blunt their ability to backdoor bankrupt these companies with scores of frivolous lawsuits.
As to the rest of your post, I agree.
Yep, but it’s a special and specific immunity, like a anti trust exemption, and since they are in politics they will need to lose that. In reality I am being facetious. Government led retribution against private business actions that are “speech” via legislative action won’t hold up under review.
Considering the legislative action is unrelated to the action of the business and being publicly tied to the unrelated action it’s actually very dangerous to meeting the criteria for extortion.
