04-07-2021, 12:09 PM
(04-07-2021, 11:30 AM)jj22 Wrote: Right. Saving on Gio's number when they had over 20m in cap left and was in the top 8 of available space.
Exactly. How I loathe this, let me count the ways:
1) Cap space is NOT an issue. We have a lot. We still have a lot.
2) We refused to splash big money in FA, instead going bargain hunting. Which is OK, given the market. But then, why did Gio need to take a pay cut? I mean, if we were gonna use that $5 mil to up the ante for a premier FA (Thuney, Trent Williams, Golladay, even Zeitler), then OK. But to do neither?
3) He asked for a release AFTER we asked him to take a pay cut. To sign no one. When we already had lots of space. Self-inflicted wound.
4) When protecting Burrow should be our #1 priority, we just lost our best pass protecting back.
5) Our WRs created the least separation in the league last year (I believe). Well, at least we have one of the best 3rd down/receiving backs in the league. Oh, nevermind.
6) I cannot believe we could not get something for him.
7) This is how we treat loyal, productive guys.
8) Bates/Hubbard extensions will not kick in until 2022 (right?), Gio's contract expires after this year. So by my reckoning, waiving him does not add 1 penny to make extending guys mire affordable. (I believe I am correct here, someone set me straight if I am wrong).
