Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mike Tannebuam Thinks Sewell Is "Necessary" And "Easy"
#30
I just wanted to toss this out here as well.

Again, not arguing for or against any player at any pick, just an honest observation.

People talk about this draft like we have to get this type or that type of WR, what we actually need is just talent at the WR position. When we are running the 4 WR sets, that leaves two guys in the slot position. If we run the bunch formation we like to run, who is the slot and who is the outside guy in that formation?

We are most likely going to get 2 WRs in this draft. If you take a "slot" guy at 38 because he is the BPA it doesn't mean you can't find a guy in the later rounds to address your proto-typical want for an over 6 foot WR.

And don't forget, we run more 4 WR sets then anything, so if you draft Moore or Moore then you literally have Higgins, Boyd on one side and Moore, Tate on the other. Not exactly horrible...

Plus don't sleep on Josh Imatorbhebhe as a 5th or 6th round pick to be the other WR in the offense.

[Image: bengals08-1-800small.jpg]




[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Mike Tannebuam Thinks Sewell Is "Necessary" And "Easy" - Murdock2420 - 04-08-2021, 04:08 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)