04-26-2021, 10:44 AM
(04-26-2021, 08:24 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Yet he was still more productive than the guys the coaches played in front of him.
Look, clearly their was a conflict between the coaches and Dunlap. The question is who do you think was in the right?
You position seems to be that no matter how incompetent or foolish the coaches may have been you are not going to place any blame on them. I disagree because Dunlap never had any problem with any other coaches n over a decade in the NFL and the other coaches he played for had winning records while the Bengals current staff has one of the worst records in the history of the league. At some point you can't just say "The coaches never do anything wrong and everything is the players fault."
You guys all act like that if you were trapped in a job with incompetent bosses that were not treating you properly you all would just bend over and take it instead of doing what you had to to get out of there. I think that is BS. Pretty much everyone I know would try to get out of a situation like that.
Not my position at all. Your position seems to be if a player doesn't want to play a certain system, it is ok for him to give half effort in a poutfest. Dunlap never had a problem with past coaches because this is the first time he was asked to play a different system, he didn't like it, he quit. I saw the effort he was given with my own eyes. I know what Dunlap was capable of, and he was barely going through the motions most games. That deserves a demotion, whether the guy behind you is worse or not.
