05-12-2021, 12:26 PM
(05-12-2021, 12:06 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: The NRA is a criminal organization?
Not on its own, of course not. But if you can read her own words and think she can operate in an unbiased fashion when prosecuting the NRA then you're not someone open to a reasonable argument on this subject.
Again, I'll be sure to remind you of this position the next time a judge hands down a ruling you don't like.
An organization that admitted to committing crimes? Yes.
The prosecution is simply charging for crimes that are believed, or in this case admitted, to have occurred. If we removed her name from the charging documents and made them an assistant of hers do your concerns magically go away? It's a nice strawman argument but doesn't really make any sense since she is literally doing exactly what the law would call for in such a case...or, you know, doing her job.
Okay? So you are admitting that if the Judge agrees with her you automatically disagree with the ruling? Interesting you are so adamant the system doesn't work when it's related to a group you are biased in favor of (which really isn't the organization but what they claim to be for). As someone who likes to champion the system often and prosecutors being tough on crime, it is very apparent that only applies if you agree with the people in the system.
You went as far as discussing how the Lt. who was improperly treated should have just complied and there wouldn't be an issue, even after "the system" found he was within his rights the whole time. You then decided that based on your own opinion the system was biased against the cops and it was all crap, because one time you knew a guy something something. I'll do it your way, if the NRA just didn't commit crimes the AG wouldn't have to charge them with crimes.
If we are being perfectly honest, the bias you have shown on this board probably should preclude you from your job. Do you hold yourself to this same standard of administering justice while stating publicly biases? Of course not, because you believe you can separate your duty from your biases. Not sure why that is so hard to understand. If it was actually a problem I am sure your superior would have a review process to either agree or disagree, similar to such a process that can play out in court.
