06-02-2021, 01:30 PM
(06-01-2021, 02:49 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Which, again, is a subjective criteria. What you consider to be such an act may not be what someone else considers such an act. So who gets to decide when such an act is warranted or not?
I didn't touch this, earlier, but I feel like I need to comment, here. The legislation objectively limited democracy. There is no subjectivity to that statement. The subjectivity lies in what level of limitation to democracy do you find acceptable. The subjectivity lies in whether it will be interpreted to be unconstitutional. There is no subjectivity, however, in whether or not the legislation in this instance limited, and thus damaged, democracy.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
