"Minority Rule"

[hollodero]

(06-02-2021, 08:16 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: If you're comparing just those two situations, then sure.  However, and this won't be the last time I point this out in this post, what you're really objecting to here is the motivation behind the action and not the action itself.

Sure, I guess in my view one party perverted the idea of "minority rule", and I'm objecting to that motivation. But if rules allow to be misused in that bad faith manner then I think it's only logical to think about the rule itself.

I understand not getting rid of every minority right. But I'd be fine with changing the rules, so that these minority rules/rights/filiwhatevers do not apply for appointing commissions or something like that. I'm sure there's some nuclear trickery to get this change through with 50 votes and I'd have no issue with that.