"Minority Rule"

[Dill]

(06-06-2021, 03:25 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Hahahaha, that you took this from my post just proves what a waste of time you are.  A person of intellectual honesty would acknowledge the merit in arguments, even when they disagree with them.  You on the other hand, well, you're you.  And, as I said, dealing with your pontifications is both tiresome and a waste of time, because Dill "doesn't see it".

Where is the "merit" missed in that argument? And why is this a standard for me, but not you?

Dill might "see it" if you could actually cite examples--post and line--and/or at least attempt to explain your point.

But you don't/can't/won't.  

I should add that by the standard you just invoked, the merit of Fred's argument, chock full of cited evidence, should be acknowledged by you.

But you don't respond to its merits. Instead of "owning" the valid points he makes, you claim (falsely) that he was universally reviled.

But again, you don't hold yourself to the standard you demand of others. And you do "see" it--hence the ad hominem rather than the "own."