"Minority Rule"

[Dill]

(06-07-2021, 11:42 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I appreciate it if you stopped adhering to a blatant double standard when it comes to behavior by people you like versus one's that you do not.  I doubt either of us will get what they want.  

LOL we've just worked through an example of one of my "blatant double standards" on this thread, haven't we? 

I invoked universally recognized criteria of civil disobedience as a merely suggested model for understanding Dem rule breaking.

When I correctly excluded your scofflaw gun owners from that definition, you cried "double standard" and claimed I was applying'
"personal criteria." so, unable to recognize the universally recognized definition as such, all you saw was "It's ok when we do it." 

After another round of personal insults and misconceptions, you conceded to a 3rd party, that the exclusion of scofflaw gun owners was correct. So no double standard based on Dill's "personal criteria" after all. 

Then you followed that by claiming the "spirit" behind those who DON'T feel strongly enough about a law they don't like to put their bodies on the line to change is "100% the same" as those who DO feel strongly enough to put their bodies on the line.  Just like resistance to Jim Crow era laws. Only without any resistance the authorities can see, and so without consequences.  100% like resistance to Jim Crow. 

Any examination of my other "blatant double standards" would turn out the same--based wholly on misconstruction, first, then rounds of deflection and obfuscation, as you except yourself from the logical consistency and standards of civility everyone else adheres too, and proudly "own" it.  As the inconsistencies mount, you demand I stop wasting your time. It's boring and intellectually dishonest of the people you slander to hold you accountable for that slander.