06-08-2021, 12:17 PM
(06-07-2021, 10:56 PM)Dill Wrote: LOL, You cannot "concede the definition of 'civil disobedience' does not apply" without seeing the merit of my argument. That WAS my argument.
I've not only "reread the whole thread" I have recapped the essential points of our disagreement several times. I don't just tell people to "reread." You cannot recap the argument; you can only offer unsupported impressions of our dialogue, record your feelings about me. Or tell me to "reread."
And now you're back to accusing me of some special exception for people who "refuse to follow such laws," never mind that you too now grant that they don't fit the definition. You feel I don't "like" those people. No wonder the central point you finally conceded sailed over your head for so long. Your feelings sent you after a double standard that didn't exist.
And no, not especially "clear." If my opinion meant nothing, you wouldn't be following me from thread to thread pulling "double standards" out of your ass. You can't stop and you can't ever make the charge stick. As you once told Dino, before violating the principle yourself, endlessly repeating a charge doesn't make it true. Let's add that "feeling/believing" it is true doesn't make it so either. And as long as your beliefs remain grounded in feelings rather than textual evidence, there'll be no changing your mind.
I've never seen a bigger gap between a person's perception of their intellect and their actual intellect. It's honestly impressive.
