Congrats Bengals!

[Murdock2420]

(11-06-2015, 08:33 AM)GMDino Wrote: I was responding to you and BFritz:

http://bengalsboard.net/Thread-Congrats-Bengals?pid=100895#pid100895


Concerning Mitchell being "dirty" vs Burfict being "dirty, but not as dirty if dirty at all".

So do you want to talk about the play on the field?  Or do you want to talk about the hypocrisy of keeping stars who get in trouble off the field while cutting scrubs?

Looks like the classic case of an inferiority complex.  Because not ALL fans said the Steelers were the ultimate in class.  And not ALL fans are happy when they do things like sign Michael Vick for example.  And if you and Fritz want to keep comparing how the organizations are run you're going to lose that one too.

As to the point BFritz was trying (desperately) to make...Mitchell wasn't dirty so I can't understand how that reflects on the Steelers as a bad organization for "tolerating" it.  Meanwhile Pacman Jones is having his portrait drawn for whatever hall-of-fame the Bengals have for ex-players.

As to the "death threat".  I keep hearing that with no explanation of what "painting" someone is?  

I suggest you google "painting another man" and do an image search and then get back to me.

Don't lump me in with him. That's insulting.

I'm still not aware of where I have called him dirty or said he needed to be cut. My only comment has been about the dirtbag LB who made a tweet about shooting Burfict on sight (seriously you are going to act like you don't know what "painting" means...really?) and the fact that all you yinzer homers where so ready to destroy the Bengals for Adam Jones, Chris Henry, etc, etc, going on about the "classy" organization run in Pitt. You guys have Mike Vick...Mike F%cking Vick....classy left the station.