CRT Part II: Defunding the Military

[Dill]

(07-02-2021, 01:10 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Third try at this post was the charm, eh?

First off, it's insanely telling, and predictable, that you make zero effort to defend Fred or refute the claims against your little buddy, but instead try and deflect the accusation onto me.  Very revealing indeed.

Sorry, Dill old buddy.  Your pathetic attempts to deflect from your blatant hypocrisy are a feeble effort.  Maybe instead of trying to constantly ignore the numerous people who see the things you apparently can not you could try buying a pair of glasses or invest in laser eye surgery?  Alternatively, you could try some self examination and try and discern why you're the only person who doesn't see what you don't see.  

Any of it would be better than this inane "I know you are but what am I" garbage tier post.  So, sincerely, thanks for the lame attempt.  Oh, and equally sincerely, enjoy your 4th of July weekend.

LOL Still no examples. Does this prove or disprove my point--accusation is your style, not demonstration?

It would be a lot easier to refute claims against "my little buddy" if you could actually provide an example, rather than just asserting that some other people agree. "Numerous people" also see the misconduct I've identified in the posts above. Go back one day, one week, five years, and they are everywhere to be found. But I don't need to lean on their opinions to make a point sufficiently made by the above examples. 

It is "insanely telling and predictable" that you cannot find similar support for your claims against Fred; you can only continue charges of Dill "blatant hypocrisy" and myopia. 

And I am not merely "deflecting" accusation onto you. My post includes NINE separate examples of you doing exactly what you claim Fred "solely" does. Why is that "feeble" when neither your nor "numerous people" can refute these examples of your own misconduct nor provide just one of Fred's? 

Finally, the issue to be addressed here is not whether Fred occasionally misconstructs others' arguments, but why forum members should be constantly invited to pile on him when he is long gone and you are yourself the gold standard of misconstruction? You are really arguing for the right to slander without proof, and that sets you against someone like me, who thinks accusing others without evidence is just toxic behavior in a forum like this--especially when you accuse them to condemn behavior you yourself happily engage in. You can't deputize yourself to police "BS" and "hypocrisy" for the forum while embracing personal attack and gaslighting as your primary MO.