07-06-2021, 12:42 PM
This reminds me of when Anti-Vaxxers use VAERS data to claim the COVID vaccines are killing people.
The thinking is:
1. Person A takes Vaccine.
2. Person A dies.
3. <Missing evidence that there is any link>
4. Therefore, the vaccine must have caused the death.
no evidence beyond the vague link that lacks context (millions of people who take the vaccine didn't die, and also there's no evidence that the vaccine caused any of those deaths in any way).
Calling this a Clinton murder follows that same conspiratorial thinking.
1. Person A did something to the Clintons.
2. Person A dies.
3. <Missing evidence that there is any link>
4. Therefore, the Clintons must have caused the death.
The thinking is:
1. Person A takes Vaccine.
2. Person A dies.
3. <Missing evidence that there is any link>
4. Therefore, the vaccine must have caused the death.
no evidence beyond the vague link that lacks context (millions of people who take the vaccine didn't die, and also there's no evidence that the vaccine caused any of those deaths in any way).
Calling this a Clinton murder follows that same conspiratorial thinking.
1. Person A did something to the Clintons.
2. Person A dies.
3. <Missing evidence that there is any link>
4. Therefore, the Clintons must have caused the death.
![[Image: oN5QAdY.png]](https://i.imgur.com/oN5QAdY.png)
