08-01-2021, 07:54 PM
(08-01-2021, 07:46 PM)BigPapaKain Wrote: Sorry, I don't buy that. When you go under oath and say 'our network is nonsense', they can no longer be absolved by saying they were just trying to dodge the lawsuit. They are on federal record admitting they're full of shit - they're full of shit and thus not a credible source for anything without being easily waved off as being full of shit, and the people that use them as a source are equally full of shit.
Wasn't Rachel Maddow forced to do the same thing?
I may have the details mixed up. I'm not sure if that was her position, or if it was the judge's ruling. But I'm pretty sure one or other got the case thrown out because of almost identical logic (This is exaggerated entertainment, not scrictly the facts.)
