11-07-2015, 05:08 PM
(11-07-2015, 04:37 PM)GMDino Wrote: Man I'm glad you came along to tell everyone who disagreed they are completely ignorant on the subject. We almost had a decent discussion going on. Thanks.
I'm very sorry.
Sorry that the voice of experience and real world application came along and ruined your speculation festival. (11-07-2015, 04:53 PM)fredtoast Wrote: I used the word "demand" to educate every here on there rights.
Do you disagree with what I said, or do you just want to play silly little "name-calling" games.
No, you used the word demand because it's inflammatory and you thought it helped you prove your point. It's a common trick by lawyers and you got caught using it. As for the "name calling" you'll have to point out that bit because I missed it. Unless your deflecting because you got caught up, which seems to be the case, in which event don't bother.
(11-07-2015, 05:00 PM)fredtoast Wrote: It is highly questionable if she could be cited for just walking in the road. Obstructing traffic in Tennessee law defines obstruction as "to render impassable or to render passage unreasonably inconvenient or potentially injurious to persons or property".
Just walking down the road usually does not qualify.
Chortle, says the man who clearly hasn't read the thread. She could be cited and wasn't. Maybe you can tell us more definitively using the same godlike powers that you displayed when you "guaranteed' that the police searched Mike's car.
