He's Back...new RT

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(09-12-2021, 01:06 PM)fredtoast Wrote: People act like Whitworth has some reason to be insulted by what the Bengals did to him when in fact the made him a reasonable offer but, like most teams, were not willing to give a three year contract to a 36 year old player.

On the other hand, Willie was still under contract and trying to play through an injury.  The Bengals told him he would either have to take a pay cut or be released.  He didn't so they cut him.  

Fans need to either stop squealing about how Whit was treated or start squealing about how Willie was treated.

https://www.cincyjungle.com/2017/3/14/14916488/andrew-whitworth-leaving-bengals-competitive-offer

Quote:the Bengals only offered Whitworth a one-year deal worth up to $10 million with incentives.

https://www.si.com/nfl/bengals/news/andrew-whitworth-bengals-offer

Quote:Whitworth said. "It wasn’t that I wouldn’t have taken a Bengals deal to come back. The Bengals offered me 50 percent, 60 percent of what every team in the league offered me.

You need to stop squealing about how the Bengals made Whit a "reasonable" offer because it continues to be as untrue as you tried to excuse it with back when it happened.

Also, how many posts are you planning on covering this board in that are just you squealing about other people squealing?