11-11-2015, 03:55 PM
(11-11-2015, 03:34 PM)djs7685 Wrote: If you're going to claim that you were still talking about bunch formations in the portion of your post that I put in bold, then it's not my fault that I can't read your mind when I assumed you were talking about a different formation when you changed paragraphs and mentioned Gronk being in the backfield.
Well, not to pick at nits here, but it was pretty clear that the entire post was about bunch formations.
Unless you thought I would address the bunch formation when Gronk was on the LOS then completely ignore the bunch formation with Gronk in the backfield and move on to something totally different.
But at least, now that you know what I was talking about, I see you have nothing to say to disagree with what I said.
