According to Pff

[KillerGoose]

(10-29-2021, 11:18 AM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: Oh, no, PFF did not confirm my biases, therefore they are worthless!!  

I cannot stand these posts.  Sorry to pick on you, the are worse posts downthread, but this has been bugging me for a while. 

Chase is ranked 4th out of, what, 150+ rookies? And you guys are mad? Ridiculous. As if you've watched every snap of Pitts or Humphrey. 

1st off, Chase has made some poor plays. He had a pass go through his hands for a pick.  Second, the first couple weeks, our offense struggled generally. Third, Herbert is a small sample size. Isiah Prince has graded out at like 90.  Does this mean PFF thinks Prince is one of the top tackles in the league? No. But it does mean he has performed really well in a limited role.   

Get a grip, people. 

I think the only person upset in here is you lol. PFF grades aren’t very valuable, it’s pretty simple. You don’t have to watch every snap of a player to know who is performing better, that’s just silly. Pitts isn’t playing better than Chase this year. That is black and white. He is playing well, but not as well, and you can see this based off of the production.

That’s really all we are saying, or at least some of us.