Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The regression of Jessie Bates
#50
(11-03-2021, 04:51 PM)TecmoBengals Wrote: I'm trying to understand it when it comes to Bates, the eye test doesn't tell me he sucks at football.

To be fair, a 60-69 PFF rating doesn't mean "suck," it means average starter.
70-79 is above average.
80+ is elite.

In the case of Bates, as Synric pointed out, he's not able to make as many impactful plays compared to last year because of the improvement of guys up front, so any problems he has shown on the field have been magnified.
Zac Taylor 2019-2020: 6 total wins
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Patience has paid off!

Sorry for Party Rocking!

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - Au165 - 11-01-2021, 08:18 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - jj22 - 11-01-2021, 08:32 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-02-2021, 12:25 AM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-02-2021, 12:42 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - CJD - 11-02-2021, 02:59 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-03-2021, 02:56 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-03-2021, 05:22 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-03-2021, 06:41 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - Dr.Z - 11-04-2021, 10:03 AM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - Tony - 11-03-2021, 01:08 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - ochocincos - 11-03-2021, 05:00 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-03-2021, 05:20 PM
RE: The regression of Jessie Bates - J24 - 11-03-2021, 06:29 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)