11-20-2021, 04:00 PM
(11-20-2021, 03:21 PM)jj22 Wrote: There's always going to be unarmed hero's with only maybe a scateboard or chair or something that try to take out active shooters or get to them and get them restrained before help arrives.
Except you're ignoring the most obvious and important part; if you don't attack someone with a gun then you won't get shot, i.e. there will be no "active shooter (btw your use of that term is deliberately loaded and we all know it).
Quote:I agree tho. The smart and safer move is to just let them run and get away and leave the job to law enforcement. Hope that they stop shooting people and leave.
We used to as a society at least applaud the bravery of the unarmed individual in schools or churches etc who restrained, fought off the active shooter insuring no more deaths.
But that was the old days.
No, we still live in those days. The issue is you don't get how the Rittenhouse case does not apply to your scenario, at all.
