PFF Thru Raiders Game

[*ochocincos*]

(11-22-2021, 06:23 PM)fredtoast Wrote: 17th and 29th are still no where close to 49th.

Correct, but in PFF's defense, they look at every single snap for every single player.
Stats only show plays that individual was the key factor in.
It's possible that Hubbard could have had some bad snaps but wasn't the one who could make a tackle, get a pressure, etc. that would rightfully make his rating lower (or higher) than where he ranks stat-wise. We saw something similar last year where Carl Lawson was rated favorably but had very few sacks.

It's a fair question to ask PFF though why someone is rated so much lower than where they align stat-wise.
I've asked them a couple questions related to things like this before though and never gotten a response.
Maybe you can have better luck.