You reap what you sow....

[Dill]

(12-02-2021, 07:08 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: You just misused that word.  I think the word you're looking for is factual.

I wouldn't either if a simple Google search would prove me wrong about the consistent lying about the facts in the Rittenhouse case.  I do appreciate you're not wasting my time asking for sources that you won't bother to read, so thank you for that.

LOL did I let you off the hook? 

You weren't going to provide any kind of factual basis for you claim anyway, if "simple Google search" was your standard.

Settling whether you claims are hyperbole or fact goes nowhere without some prior agreement/standard of what counts as "trustworthy" in media accounts, and what counts as MSM.  Probably some definition of "lie" in the context of reporting needs to be added as well. You've shown no aptitude for or interest in this kind of groundwork in the past.

As for the last bolded--you've no reason to assume I don't read evidence presented to me in posted discussions.
E.g. I have never responded to another's post with "TLR"; but the record here is replete with examples of your willingness to make sweeping claims about sources you have not troubled yourself to read/view/understand. 

So again, the projection of your behavior on to me. We just had another example of that recently on the Rittenhouse thread when, after accusing me of "bad faith" and "deliberate falsehood," you asserted later that you had worked to avoid ad hominem and I had not--though you could provide no examples of my bad behavior.