11-16-2015, 11:46 PM
(11-16-2015, 09:30 PM)masterpanthera_t Wrote: I wanted to make this note: the way the word "savage" has been defined (savage = uncivilized), the only way it can be consistently used without seeming prejudicial is to readily concede then that there have been within the last 100 years, German "savages", Irish "savages", American "savages" , Chinese "savages", Russian "savages", Arab-nation based "savages", Central American "savages", African "savages" and many more "savages" from many other places.
If the above point cannot be conceded, then without a doubt we can assume racial/ethnic motives when a certain poster uses the word "savages".
When people behave in an uncivil manner over and over they are savages . It just so happened I mentioned where the current uncivil people resided and these guys ran with it. I have been using the correct definition. They just can't see past their PC bs.
What's hilarious is had I said uncivilized it would never have been mentioned. Even though it's the exact same thing
