12-12-2021, 07:43 AM
(12-12-2021, 02:26 AM)CKwi88 Wrote: While my kneejerk is to similarly go "Cause Murica!" There are some objective reasons why shooting with a suppresor is preferable.
Less noise, less recoil, improved accuracy, and I'm confident Bels could rattle off quite a few other points.
You hit the main ones. Personally, I want a suppressor for hunting. I've tried things like Walker's Game Ear, which allow you to hear normally (or amplified) but cut out high decibel sounds. Problem is that they are battery operated and they don't stay seated all the time. Plus, they just don't always work. Using a suppressed hunting rifle means that I don't do as much damage to my hearing while I take a shot at a deer, bear, or other critters. I want one for my Glocks because, well, it'd be fun.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
