12/7 - Terrorist attack

[Dill]

(12-14-2021, 08:48 PM)hollodero Wrote: No, I don't see them as equivalent. As I stated many times, the right wing networks cross borders their counterparts would not cross. Yep, FOX is even worse.

That just doesn't lead me to the conclusion that since FOX is so bad, those on the other siede are automatically the force of good. To me, they most certainly are not, and I could create one of my lists to underline why I think that. But overall, many MSNBC hosts are partisan hacks with very narrow perspectives and kopsided coverage, trying to steer their audience. I (of course with several exceptions) see them as part of the problem. 

One reason why I don't see them as equivalent is because I believe I have learned a lot about law and politics and history from watching MSNBC--at least from Maddow and Haines, whom I mainly watch. 

I also rather enjoy CNN Sunday shows, with people like Fareed Zacharia. 

Where, in your view, is MSNBC/CNN trying to steer its audience? How does redressing/correcting Fox disinformation make them part of the problem, not a "force of good"? Do you have special commentators in mind? Have you an example of the "massive spin" you find there?

Are there political commentators with daily/weakly shows anywhere whom you don't think are partisan hacks? 

Just trying to get a sense of your standards, from someone whose judgment I generally respect. And this matters because, from my perspective, the current Fox/right wing disinformation campaign sustains itself in great part on false media equivalencies--like Cuomo = Tucker, and "both sides" spin fake news every day.