Let’s Compare

[*bfine32*]

(12-28-2021, 12:11 PM)Daddy-O Wrote: I'm not a fan of ZT as a play caller but decisions can go either way based on execution.  Just ask John Harbaugh.

The "Zac costs us games because of play calling" is just folks unwilling to get all the salt out of their mouths. Let's look at a few loses:

Chicago: Burrow throws 3 consecutive INTs, yet we only lose by 3. i suppose Zac shouldn't have called for 3 INTs in a row

Packers: We take the best team in the NFL in OT and would have won if our kicker didn't miss 2 consecutive FGs. I suppose Zac shouldn't have called for the back to back missed FGs

Jets: Up by 5 in the 4th and JB throws a silly INT. I suppose Zac should have taken the ball out of JB's hand. Despite this we are still set up to get a final tying/winning score but Hilton is called for a phantom Unnecessary Roughness call after we stop them on 3rd and 11. I suppose Zac should have told the ref not to make the call