Let’s Compare

[*SHRacerX*]

(12-28-2021, 06:27 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: We haven't.   

Prefering Sewell was never about Chase being poor.  It was obvious he was gonna be good, and he has been better than good.  Deservedly a pro-bowler despite some costly drops (Chargers, + 1 more, Bears game?).  

The idea is that you can very good/great WRs later in round 1.  Jefferson was picked in the 20s, for instance.  Whilst generational OTs rarely last past 10.  

Of course, Sewell has yet to rise to a pro-bowl level. That has to happen before this is even a discussion.  

Those that advocated trading back for more picks might have had the best call.  I wouldn't mind Slater + Parsons.  

Carman instead of Creed Humphrey is the real boner pick, however.

Preferring Sewell was a lack of understanding of weapons on offense.  I'm done.   Not going to respond to any more of this crap about Chase.  If people still don't see it....