01-06-2022, 06:17 PM
(01-06-2022, 10:48 AM)KillerGoose Wrote: Raw interceptions don’t tell you much, INT % is a more accurate metric to build opinions off of. How many interceptions are they throwing in relation to how many passes they are throwing? Burrows INT% was at point bottom three in the league, but he’s doing a great job now.
It also omits the INTs caused solely by a receiver or Olineman. Not all INTs are created equally, but they all go in the stat sheet equally..
As far as national media..they are not all created equally either. Example, Boomer is part of national media, so is Wilcots, Colinsworth, etc.. Plenty of decent people in the field, but the bozo's are the squeaky wheels and get all the grease .. Goes with the territory I guess..
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
