Bengals Player Haters Ball

[BengalsRocker]

(01-19-2022, 09:00 PM)Science Friction Wrote: If that one fool ( I think it's Phil Simms' kid) doesn't quit saying "BANGLES,"  I think he should he should be added to the list.  Dumb@ss.

Well I was going to add Chris Simms to the hater pile but not for your reason.

He is a supreme douchebag and this little nugget...





The Cincinnati Bengals' helmet didn't fare well in rankings of NFL teams' helmet designs from Chris Simms and Ahmed Fareed on Chris Simms Unbuttoned.


Fareed ranked the design of the Bengals' helmet second-worst in the NFL.

"All the losing and the mediocrity has made this worse," Fareed said. "Like if they were a good team - crushing it - it probably wouldn't look as bad."


"Rebrand! Be like the Broncos - the Broncos lost four Super Bowls and changed and all of a sudden, they won two Super Bowls. I mean, just change it," Simms said. "They gotta change the look, they really do. It just is a symbolism for loser. I almost look at that as more of a symbolism for loser than I do as the Browns."

Both agreed that a crown on the helmet representing the Queen City might be cool. Or, Fareed suggested, just putting "NATI" on the helmets. 

Simms pointed out that Cincinnati doesn't have Bengal tigers, and ranked the Bengals' helmet the worst.

"Not only was the helmet bad, but there's no theme or common thing with the region," Simms said. "So that's why. Oh, that's right, sorry, forgot about the (Bengal) stove. That's it. That defines the city."