Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS
#26
(01-27-2022, 08:00 PM)treee Wrote: Pretty sure they both have Doctorates from Harvard Law School. But it would not be unreasonable to argue that anyone who has not sat as a judge is not qualified for the supreme court.

I don't know why they would start making that a requirement, now. 41 United States Justices were not judges prior to sitting on the SCOTUS. This includes some of the most known names of Chief Justices in SCOTUS history like Taney, Rehnquist, and Warren as well as several other Chief Justices.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Belsnickel - 01-26-2022, 02:20 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Nately120 - 01-26-2022, 02:47 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-26-2022, 03:00 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Nately120 - 01-26-2022, 03:03 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Au165 - 01-26-2022, 03:12 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - CKwi88 - 01-26-2022, 03:13 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Belsnickel - 01-26-2022, 03:13 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Au165 - 01-26-2022, 03:14 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Belsnickel - 01-26-2022, 03:15 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Au165 - 01-26-2022, 03:16 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Nately120 - 01-26-2022, 03:16 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Nately120 - 01-26-2022, 07:23 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Belsnickel - 01-26-2022, 03:18 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Nately120 - 01-26-2022, 03:21 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-26-2022, 10:21 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - CJD - 01-26-2022, 11:58 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Nately120 - 01-27-2022, 01:57 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Millhouse - 01-27-2022, 07:30 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - treee - 01-27-2022, 08:00 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Millhouse - 01-27-2022, 08:22 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - treee - 01-27-2022, 08:40 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-27-2022, 05:15 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Belsnickel - 01-28-2022, 10:12 AM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - treee - 01-28-2022, 04:06 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-28-2022, 11:26 AM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-28-2022, 05:26 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-29-2022, 11:50 AM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-29-2022, 12:15 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-30-2022, 12:27 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Belsnickel - 01-30-2022, 02:44 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-30-2022, 02:49 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Belsnickel - 01-30-2022, 08:06 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - BmorePat87 - 01-30-2022, 08:59 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-30-2022, 10:24 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - BmorePat87 - 01-30-2022, 10:58 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 02-01-2022, 03:26 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 02-02-2022, 02:58 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)