Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS
#38
(01-30-2022, 04:52 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: We've both pointed out that neither side of the political aisle fails to nominate partisan candidates.  Why do many here have zero issue with Sotomayor being as reliable a "liberal" justice as Thomas is a "conservative" one?  In fact, the only justices who have sided with the other with any degree of regularity are those considered conservative.  Roberts being the obvious one, but Kavanaugh has sided with the liberal wing on more than one case as well, and I'm not talking about the rare 9-0 cases.  

What's especially funny is you getting a thumbs up from someone who is the greatest offenders in this regard.  Smirk

I have just been known to state that the Justices are politicians and the court is political. I just wish people would admit this.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Belsnickel - 01-26-2022, 02:20 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Nately120 - 01-26-2022, 02:47 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-26-2022, 03:00 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Nately120 - 01-26-2022, 03:03 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Au165 - 01-26-2022, 03:12 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - CKwi88 - 01-26-2022, 03:13 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Belsnickel - 01-26-2022, 03:13 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Au165 - 01-26-2022, 03:14 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Belsnickel - 01-26-2022, 03:15 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Au165 - 01-26-2022, 03:16 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Nately120 - 01-26-2022, 03:16 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Nately120 - 01-26-2022, 07:23 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Belsnickel - 01-26-2022, 03:18 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Nately120 - 01-26-2022, 03:21 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-26-2022, 10:21 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - CJD - 01-26-2022, 11:58 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Nately120 - 01-27-2022, 01:57 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Millhouse - 01-27-2022, 07:30 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - treee - 01-27-2022, 08:00 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Millhouse - 01-27-2022, 08:22 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - treee - 01-27-2022, 08:40 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-27-2022, 05:15 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Belsnickel - 01-28-2022, 10:12 AM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - treee - 01-28-2022, 04:06 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-28-2022, 11:26 AM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-28-2022, 05:26 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-29-2022, 11:50 AM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-29-2022, 12:15 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-30-2022, 12:27 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Belsnickel - 01-30-2022, 02:44 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-30-2022, 02:49 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - Belsnickel - 01-30-2022, 08:06 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - BmorePat87 - 01-30-2022, 08:59 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 01-30-2022, 10:24 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - BmorePat87 - 01-30-2022, 10:58 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 02-01-2022, 03:26 PM
RE: Stephen Breyer/SCOTUS - GMDino - 02-02-2022, 02:58 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)