02-13-2022, 02:57 PM
(02-13-2022, 01:22 PM)GMDino Wrote: Indeed I've been taken to task for saying the same about him.
However it was not quite as legitimate as it seems. The idea being that it was equally unfair to make doctors who had lifetime approval to suddenly have to renew every ten years and that as the older doctors retired everyone WOULD be under the same rules.
Paul formed a board with his wife and father in law. Approved himself and then the board never met again.
He may do good deeds occasionally but he is childish as the current thread shows.
Yes it would be unfair to those who've been practicing long before 1992. But what about the more recent grads from the late 80s/early 90s? The answer was obviously some sort of phase in process rather than a drop dead cut-off date. But that's not what the policy was, so yes it was a legitimate concern.
Regardless, that really wasn't the point. Point being is that the post that I was quoting was outright saying that Paul couldn't become a board certified physician, and that creating his own board was done specifically for the purpose of becoming one. That's simply not true. The creation of the board was due to a legitimate concern of an ABO policy.
