Did the Bengals get robbed?

[Nepa]

(02-14-2022, 05:39 PM)PocketAces32 Wrote: A little bias here lol. Wilson had BOTH hands on Kupp and his arms were extended. He didn’t hold but his arms and body were in the position to where it made it look like a hold. It wasn’t pulled out of nowhere.

So, what you are saying is that it wasn't a hold, but the official could have imagined a hold.  So, in the last two minutes of a tight game, the official decided that, although he couldn't actually see a hold, it was a good idea to call one.  Yeah, that's very comforting.  

I mean, have you see any reputable person who said it was a hold?  The former VP of officials, quite a dependable source, said it wasn't a hold. Others have watched the play and shown video of the play demonstrating it wasn't a hold. So, the official could not have seen a hold if there was none. Are officials just supposed to call a hold even if they don't see one?

Missed actual holds make sense. Calling phantom holds do not make sense.