02-17-2022, 12:30 PM
(02-16-2022, 09:17 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: This may only be a symbolic victory given the status of Remington, but one that may change firearms advertising for the foreseeable future. I don't really know what that advertising looks like, though. I couldn't honestly tell you the last time I saw an ad for a gun, though the last one was probably for a shotgun I couldn't afford used for upland game.
I can't see it being a victory at all. The CT judge clearly ignored federal law in allowing this lawsuit to go forward. I can't see an endgame for this plea deal for Remington, it should have been appealed to death. It's funny, no one crying about judicial activism here, when this is one of the most blatant examples of I've ever seen. The argument that "consider your man-card reissued" is so inflammatory that any reasonable person would know it would incite a mass shooting, or any shooting, is one of the dumbest legal arguments outside the Twinkie defense and affluenza.
