Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Are we being realistic with Free Agency expectations?
#68
(02-18-2022, 08:25 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: The idea of spending $33-35m/yr on just Bates, Uzomah, and Hill is hilariously bad.

Bates isn't worth anywhere near $16-18m/yr. I'm not even sure he's worth a $13m franchise tag. $18m/yr would make him tied for the 27th highest paid non-QB player in the entire NFL. Also.. why would you ever front load? That's nonsense.

Uzomah isn't worth anywhere near $8.3m/yr. That would make him the 8th highest paid TE in the league and he's heading into his age 29 season and has never reached 500 yards receiving before.

Hill isn't worth anywhere near $8.75m/yr. That would make him the 19th highest paid DT in the league and he's a part-time player non-starter. Jonathan Fanene part 2.

- - - - -

I get people have been reading Hobspin articles for years and years now, but you don't need to regurgitate that line of thinking in order to preemptively cover up for the 7th Annual Not Fixing The OL offseason.
I like Hill a lot, but I feel like they'll try and bring back Ogunjobi on a discount after the injury.  Having those 2 most of the year was a privelidge we just won't get to carry into the 2022 season.  Better draft another DT.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Are we being realistic with Free Agency expectations? - samhain - 02-18-2022, 10:12 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)