O-Line Cost Us a Championship

[Bengalbug]

(02-20-2022, 04:40 PM)CincyDog Wrote: If you do not think a 25-30% reduction in sacks is a huge, you have no business commenting on NFL football

Not worth the effort.. Obviously there is a huge difference in a sack per game. In addition to the recordable stats of sacks, it likely means less pressure and more rush yards. Take away one negative play per game, may lead to more first downs and sustained drives, leading to more scoring opportunities.

It’s clear as day the line is bad, and “even” only one sack per game would make a huge difference. Burrow would go from succeeding as the most sacked qb, and probably succeeding better as a bottom 3rd sacked qb. I’m hoping they can somehow get this offensive line to top 50%