Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits
#28
(03-11-2022, 07:56 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Personally, I don't believe that being true at all.
Bengals often don't leak who they are targeting in FA.
Sounds like smoke and mirrors to me.

Could be, they are all rumors until it actually happens.

(03-11-2022, 07:58 PM)casear2727 Wrote: Another reason we dont sign these guys is they dont like to spend money on guards.  Norwell on a discount or Pollack believing he can coach up C Williams.

Schreff is out due to age and money, possibly the same for Tomlinson. Corbett is best fit, but still more than they want to pay.

That needs to change. Daniels isn't just a Guard though, he is a Center to boot and RG was our worst position on the 
team last season. I do think we can find a Guard in the Draft much easier than a RT though which I find essential in 
this FA with this Draft that after the first few OT's it really dries up as far as opening day starters.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - ochocincos - 03-11-2022, 01:00 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - Synric - 03-11-2022, 01:02 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - Synric - 03-11-2022, 01:30 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - fredtoast - 03-11-2022, 01:14 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - magikod - 03-11-2022, 01:39 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - Dr.Z - 03-11-2022, 02:58 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - pulses - 03-11-2022, 08:32 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - bfine32 - 03-11-2022, 04:52 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 03-11-2022, 08:12 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - pulses - 03-11-2022, 08:18 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)