03-18-2022, 09:53 PM
(03-18-2022, 09:48 PM)casear2727 Wrote: The fact he was never accused of failing ANY tests does matter regardless the substance. The fact that the substance in question is no longer banned does have some bearing in my opinion.
Again, some of you are trying to avoid a little bit of humiliation for being so wrong in your previous assessments that you are now trying to salvage any "evaluation credibility" you can.... instead of admitting you never truly researched anything and might have overreacted.
How are we being "so wrong"? You said we should give up our 1st RD pick for a guy that got cut..
I know exactly what happened with LC; you look back in the thread you might understand that instead of pretending a young RT that had a PFF rating in the 80s on a $10 MIL contract got cut because no one wanted to give anything of value for him.