Don't Say Gay?

[Belsnickel]

(03-23-2022, 09:49 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I get what you're saying, but there has to be a limit.  If Texas decided to instill curriculum that minimized the Holocaust, or even denied it occurred, I don't think many would share your position.  I think you would remain consistent, but most people aren't you in this regard.

And that's when you replace board members.

I am not big on education policy, it's just not my bag. I like to research and evaluate conservation policy a lot more. Conservation policy and education policy have a similarity, though. Both are fields in which states tend to have appointed boards to oversee the policies related to these areas. There is usually a board or commission for wildlife that will put in place the regulations revolving around hunting and fishing regulations. These policies are guided by experts in the field that present the science to the board members who then make decisions based on that information. These regulations are easier to change because the field is a dynamic one and has to respond to new information on a regular basis and it's important to keep them that way. Legislating wildlife conservation policy is a terrible idea for this reason.

Education works in a similar way. Many people think of education as pretty static, but that is far from the truth. There are many moving parts in the administration of our primary and secondary education in this country that requires this more timely action. Curriculum, especially, is a part of this.

I know that you didn't really argue against me, I'm just kind of expanding on my point so that way people can understand my position.