Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bates - FT
#11
(03-30-2022, 05:50 AM)casear2727 Wrote: I think our staff would as well.  But with Hamilton, Hill, Brisker and Cine available throughout these picks if Im the Jets I'd say no way.

There has been speculation the Jets could take Hamilton at #4 or 10 (which I think is too high for a S, personally.) If they could trade for Bates with #38, they could target other positions than S with picks 4, 10, and 35.

On the other hand, they may prefer to draft a S in the 1st or 2nd instead of trading for Bates.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Bates - FT - WVUHomer - 03-29-2022, 12:26 PM
RE: Bates - FT - Synric - 03-29-2022, 12:34 PM
RE: Bates - FT - ochocincos - 03-29-2022, 01:33 PM
RE: Bates - FT - Synric - 03-29-2022, 01:40 PM
RE: Bates - FT - WVUHomer - 03-29-2022, 01:44 PM
RE: Bates - FT - casear2727 - 03-30-2022, 05:32 AM
RE: Bates - FT - TheLeonardLeap - 03-31-2022, 02:47 AM
RE: Bates - FT - Synric - 04-01-2022, 12:15 PM
RE: Bates - FT - TheLeonardLeap - 04-01-2022, 01:17 PM
RE: Bates - FT - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 03-29-2022, 12:41 PM
RE: Bates - FT - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 03-30-2022, 05:46 AM
RE: Bates - FT - casear2727 - 03-30-2022, 05:50 AM
RE: Bates - FT - WVUHomer - 03-30-2022, 06:11 AM
RE: Bates - FT - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 03-30-2022, 10:06 AM
RE: Bates - FT - casear2727 - 03-30-2022, 10:17 AM
RE: Bates - FT - Whatever - 03-30-2022, 12:47 PM
RE: Bates - FT - casear2727 - 03-30-2022, 12:58 PM
RE: Bates - FT - Speedy Thomas - 03-30-2022, 06:31 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)