04-13-2022, 12:15 PM
(04-13-2022, 07:56 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: This. We all love Higgins, but the fact is there are more NFL ready WRs coming out of college now than ever before. Rookies making a huge impact. It would probably be one of the easier positions to replace. Especially if he has another really good year and teams like the Jags are overpaying guys like Kirk.
There is NO DOUBT Burrow and Chase are cornerstones. Higgins is great but I can't see spending that much on one position group with all the talent coming out in the draft.
Look at it this way: You get Pierce in Rd 2, and you get a 2nd round pick for Higgins after this year (as he only has one more cheap year on his rookie deal, but that is still one year). You now have roughly $15-18 million more dollars of cap space and another pick to use on extending the likes of Wilson, Bell, Chido, Jonah, etc. It isn't a small chunk.
When the Pats were on their domination streak (yes, a lot of it was Brady) they rarely paid super high FA dollars to players they developed. They just avoided massive holes on their roster by stockpiling picks and having cap space to plug holes with solid veterans.
People are reading this like I want Higgins gone for a guy like Pierce and that couldn't be further from the truth, but I also know the realities of having that much money in one position group could create holes in another spot on the roster.
Seems like your logic is circular. On one hand you claim we can easily replace Higgins with a second round pick, but then you claim teams will give us a second round pick for Higgins.
If it was that easy to get a replacement as good as Higgins then other teams would just draft a WR and pay him a couple of million on a rookie contract instead of trading for Higgins and paying him 5 times as much.
When you trade a proven star for a draft pick you could very easily end up with a player not nearly as good as Tee. Possibly a complete bust. You make those type of moves when you are rebuilding not when you are trying to win championships.
