Darren Waller

[Au165]

(04-27-2022, 10:01 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Thanks for making my point.  Wallers numbers will probably go down with the Bengals because he won't be targeted downfield as much.

He was the #2 target for the Raiders last year.  He would be #4 for the Bengals.

Boyd, Higgins, and Chase are all better receivers than Waller.  No way would I want to take any targets away from those three for Waller.

This isn’t receptions it’s targets meaning routes ran. The opposite is true, shorter target depth means he’d be more efficient. You said his catching wasn’t as good, the point is because catch rate tends to go down the further down the field you get.