Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss
#15
(05-13-2022, 11:55 AM)KillerGoose Wrote: If he is obviously running and not looking to pass, then yes. Once the QB has established himself as a runner, it is a TFL. If he is scrambling to buy time for a pass, it is a sack.

I believe a lot of this is by the discretion of the home statisticians which leads to a natural degree of ambiguity at times, much like how some home teams are much more liberal with handing out solo tackle statistics and some seem adverse to giving out assisted tackles.  
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-12-2022, 01:20 AM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-12-2022, 02:05 AM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-12-2022, 02:12 AM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-12-2022, 11:23 AM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-13-2022, 09:29 PM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-14-2022, 12:44 AM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-12-2022, 02:33 PM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - Dr.Z - 05-13-2022, 12:54 PM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-13-2022, 03:37 PM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-13-2022, 03:41 PM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-13-2022, 04:41 PM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - MasonDT70 - 05-15-2022, 07:29 PM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - grampahol - 05-14-2022, 10:25 AM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - grampahol - 05-15-2022, 10:51 AM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-15-2022, 11:46 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)