Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss
#32
(05-13-2022, 12:54 PM)Dr.Z Wrote: I believe a lot of this is by the discretion of the home statisticians which leads to a natural degree of ambiguity at times, much like how some home teams are much more liberal with handing out solo tackle statistics and some seem adverse to giving out assisted tackles.  

That reminds me of the year where Maualuga had 122 tackles with like half of them being assists, and the Bengals team said they had Maualuga at something like 180 tackles according to their counting that year. Presumably because anytime Maualuga was near a guy who got tackled he got assist credit. Lol

It was just such a huge difference that it stuck in my mind.
____________________________________________________________

[Image: jamarr-chase.gif]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-12-2022, 01:20 AM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-12-2022, 02:05 AM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-12-2022, 02:12 AM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-12-2022, 11:23 AM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-13-2022, 09:29 PM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-14-2022, 12:44 AM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-12-2022, 02:33 PM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - Dr.Z - 05-13-2022, 12:54 PM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - TheLeonardLeap - 05-14-2022, 10:51 AM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-13-2022, 03:37 PM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-13-2022, 03:41 PM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-13-2022, 04:41 PM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - MasonDT70 - 05-15-2022, 07:29 PM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - grampahol - 05-14-2022, 10:25 AM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - grampahol - 05-15-2022, 10:51 AM
RE: Sacks and Tackles-For-Loss - fredtoast - 05-15-2022, 11:46 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)